作者loveoldbear (gene)
看板PhD
標題Re: [問題] 碩士生投稿期刊求解
時間Wed Jan 16 02:27:15 2019
※ 引述《loveoldbear (gene)》之銘言:
: 大家好!
: (原先留在推文的地方,但我不太會用推文寫長的回應,所以就再重發到這了,不好意
思
: !)
: 2018.12.22進度:
: 前天終於鼓起勇氣寫了封信詢問對方期刊稿件狀態,剛才老師也回覆給我回信內容,應
該
: 就是reviewer的審稿意見還不夠多,目前還處於peer review狀態!
: 發現對方語氣好誠懇!一直跟我們道歉!
: 我想,我們就繼續努力等候吧!
: 信件原文如下:
: Dear xxxxx,
: Thank you for your email and please accept my sincerest apologies for the la
ck
: of update on your paper. We have unfortunately been having problems obtaini
ng
: sufficient reviewer reports as requested by the handling Editor and as such
,
: your manuscript is still going through the peer review process. I completely
: understand that this delay is unacceptable and I cannot apologise enough f
or
: this.
: Please be assured that we are always in regular contact with the handling Ed
it
: or and doing all we can to ensure your manuscript is expedited through the p
ub
: lishing process as swiftly as possible. We hope to get a decision to you soo
n
: and your patience while we do this will be greatly appreciated.
: Please do not hesitate to contact us again if there is anything we may be ab
le
: to help you with, and please accept my apologies once more.
: Kind regards,
: xxxxxxx
: xxxxxxx
: Publishing Assistant
: Scientific Reports
108.01.16更新狀態:
剛剛看到狀態變成Decision Started了!
可是發現好像又有送出Peer review一次然後再變回Decision Started狀態(在同一天內)
!是要被拒的意思嗎QQ??
https://i.imgur.com/SZ6QWWi.jpg
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.72.33.65
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PhD/M.1547576837.A.677.html
推 xiix: GG! 01/16 10:26
推 zxp9505007: comment不夠 再多給幾個審?還是有人拒審? 01/16 11:52
→ loveoldbear: 現在不是已經在decision started了?我認為comment 01/16 12:00
→ loveoldbear: 應該已經夠了(?),但我不知道為何最後再次出現一次pe 01/16 12:00
→ loveoldbear: er review,再變成decision started? 01/16 12:00
推 cssu: Decision started有可能是系統判斷已經收到足夠的reviewer c 01/16 12:48
→ cssu: omments, 比如說送三個已經回來兩個,但主編有可能想等第三 01/16 12:48
→ cssu: 個或是主編覺得意見不夠他判斷,有想再找reviewer看,所以 01/16 12:48
→ cssu: 狀態會停在Decision started,但其實還在等意見回來 01/16 12:48
→ saltlake: 同樓上。文章的科學正確性是最終標準,特殊狀況下,主編 01/16 13:07
→ saltlake: 有權限臨時增加稿審數目。例如常態兩三人可能增到三四人 01/16 13:07
→ saltlake: 等。這種案例不多,但非沒有。 01/16 13:08
推 anr2: 正面看待 即便被拒 好好參考comments 修改 都有機會 01/16 15:00
推 narwhale: 我有遇過增加reviewer的情況,最初只有兩位,他們的問題 01/18 20:03
→ narwhale: 我都在response letter回覆了想說應該要接受了,但主編 01/18 20:05
→ narwhale: 又找了第三位reviewer來審我修改過的稿子,當時的狀態就 01/18 20:06
→ narwhale: Ready for Decision變回Reviewer Invited 01/18 20:07
推 xiix: 真的很奇怪 01/18 21:38