[閒聊] M-history without the M

[hayuyang (Cloud)]

在找一些m-theory paper的時候

找到這篇

看到中間越看越覺得怪怪的

However, attitudes to eleven dimensions among both string and membrane
theorists underwent a sea-change in March 1995 when string-guru Edward Witten,
drawing on work by Hull and Townsend, Sen and myself, made an astonishing
announcement at the Strings 95 conference in Los Angeles.

很多都說Witten 竟然能想像string second revolution  Witten超爆幹強

這裡作者是不是不太爽說Witten 所以是 draw on work阿

感覺這篇是作者在嗆人的樣子xD


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.229.203.183
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Physics/M.1479227151.A.CF4.html
※ 編輯: hayuyang (36.229.203.183), 11/16/2016 00:31:10
推 recorriendo: yes!
→ wohtp: draw on work沒什麼貶意。做研究哪可能沒有前人的脈絡？
推 gonghour: 這篇的作者是?
推 sputtering: HDT 請問這po的價值是?