世宗的Mid-term 總是令人戰戰兢兢，卻有種不言而喻的興奮和愉悅～
1. What is the meaning in Hulle v. Orynge case for the action of an injury ?
2. Why D is not answerable for an inevitable injury? (Weaver v. Ward)
3. Two dogs, owned by P and D, were fighting, D tried to seperate them
by hitting them with a stick. In doing so, D backed up toward P,
and in raising his stick over his shoulder, struck P in the eye, injuring P.
How the court discussed the case and gave the judgement ?
4. Why D is not liable for the injury to P because of his sudden stricken by an illness?
5. What are the reasons for P who has sustained property damage caused by D's
blasting on nearby property can maintain an action for damage without showing
that D was negligent?
6. D, a 6-year-old boy, pulled the chair out from under P while P was in the act
of sitting down, causing P falling to the ground and injury. D defended he was
a minor and did not have any wilful purpose in doing so for the injury of P.
How the Court ruled the case and who won ?
7. D was hunting for wolves that P's dong had a resemblance to a wolf, D in good
faith believed to be wolf and killed P's dog. Is D answerable for the value
of P's dog?
8. Why an insane person is liable for the intentional damage to the injured
person in the same circumstances in which a normal person would be liable?
9. D touched P's shoulder to get her attention over the noise of the alarm, causing P's
injury. What are the reasons for the court to rule that D is not liable for battery?
10. Why the court refused to apply the doctrine of strict liability to automobile
drivers?
----------------------------------------
修了英美侵，我看英文的速度在不知不覺中變得更快了^^
世宗其實教得很好，有認真就有收穫 ┴∪┴
--
Yijich
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.251.143.165
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/SCU_LAWS/M.1510843687.A.F8C.html