Re: [新聞] 比利時已提上訴、但不保證賽前會有結果

[wamng (bobof)]

02年韓國的荒謬裁判 被黑到現在

這次荒謬程度應該算超過那時候了

美國是打算被黑一輩子嗎

FIFA自己都對政治干涉足球的事情有嚴格規定

就拿今年尼泊爾足協被FIFA全球禁賽的事情來說

也是因為尼泊爾政治干涉足協事務被FIFA禁賽

結果這次FIFA自己就違反這規定

因為川普一個電話 英凡提諾就可以啟動什麼委員會 改判延緩一年執行...




※ 引述《zxc906383 (無無)》之銘言：
: https://reurl.cc/yW1Ok6
: Belgium has appealed against FIFA’s decision to suspend the one-game ban handed
: to Folarin Balogun, less than 24 hours out from the team’s World Cup round-of-
: 16 game against the United States.
: 比利時已對FIFA的決定提出上訴，該決定原本是對Folarin Balogun做出的一場禁賽處分，
: 但距離對陣美國隊的世界盃16強比賽不到24小時，這項禁賽卻被暫時撤銷
: In a statement — released Monday, after The Athletic exclusively revealed that
: Belgium had the right to appeal the decision — the Royal Belgian Football Assoc
: iation (RBFA) confirmed it had “no alternative but to challenge (Balogun’s) el
: igibility for the upcoming match”.
: 在週一發布的聲明中（此前《The Athletic》獨家披露比利時有權上訴），比利時足協表示
: ，他們「別無選擇，只能挑戰（Balogun）在即將到來比賽中的出場資格」
: The RBFA said it had learned of the change in Balogun’s circumstances through m
: edia reports and written to FIFA to request a full explanation of “the process
: ” and “applicable regulations”.
: 比利時足協表示，他們是透過媒體報導才得知Folarin Balogun情況的變動，並已致函FIFA
: ，要求完整說明「程序」與「適用規則」
: “As its only response, FIFA sent a letter to the RBFA stating that it considere
: d this correspondence to constitute an appeal that a judge had been appointed,
: and that the RBFA had only a few hours to complete that appeal. No information w
: hatsoever was provided by FIFA,” the RBFA statement continued.
: RBFA聲明續稱：「FIFA唯一的回應，是來信表示將此視為上訴，並已指派法官，且RBFA僅剩
: 數小時完成上訴，但FIFA未提供任何資訊」
: “For an appeal to be admissible, FIFA’s own regulations state that the reasone
: d decision must first have been communicated to the appellant. While the RBFA wa
: s merely seeking legitimate explanations, FIFA itself created an appeal and imme
: diately ensured that it would be declared inadmissible.”
: 「依FIFA規定，上訴成立前必須先向申訴方提供具理由的決定，但RBFA只是要求合理解釋，
: FIFA卻自行將其視為上訴，並使其立即可能被判定不成立」
: “All of this occurred while FIFA simultaneously refused to respond to the RBFA
: ’s legitimate requests … To be clear, as of this moment, the RBFA has still no
: t received any decision or any explanation from FIFA regarding this matter. It t
: herefore has no alternative but to challenge the player’s eligibility for the u
: pcoming match.”
: 「在這一切發生同時，FIFA也拒絕回應RBFA的合理請求……截至目前，RBFA仍未收到任何決
: 定或解釋，因此別無選擇，只能挑戰該球員的出賽資格」
: Sources briefed on the matter, speaking anonymously to protect relationships, ha
: ve now told The Athletic that both U.S. Soccer and the Belgian federation were a
: sked to make submissions by 5am PST on Monday morning, which has exasperated the
: Belgians who have not received the decision by FIFA to review, as it is not mad
: e public.
: 知情人士匿名向《The Athletic》表示，美國足球協會與比利時足協都被要求在週一清晨5
: 點（太平洋時間）前提交文件，但比利時方面尚未收到FIFA的公開審查決定，對此感到相當
: 不滿
: A member of the FIFA appeals committee — who does not represent a federation in
: either UEFA or CONCACAF — has been selected to hear the case.
: 一名FIFA Appeals Committee成員已被指定審理此案，且該成員不代表UEFA或CONCACAF任何
: 協會，以避免利益衝突
: Submissions must now be made by Monday morning, with a ruling possible before th
: e game, but Belgium have not been provided with any guarantees by FIFA that this
: will be the case.
: 相關文件必須在週一上午前提交，裁決有可能在比賽前出爐，但FIFA並未向比利時保證一定
: 會在賽前完成判決
: It would be extraordinary at this stage if FIFA were to change their position fo
: r a second time, with Balogun under a one game ban between Wednesday night until
: Sunday morning, until FIFA suddenly suspended the one-match ban. It is unclear
: whether the appeal is merely procedural or if it has a genuine chance of moving
: the goalposts once more ahead of a huge knockout game at a World Cup.
: 在此階段若FIFA再次改變立場將極不尋常，Folarin Balogun原本自週三晚至週日早晨處於
: 禁賽狀態，但FIFA突然暫停禁賽，目前仍不清楚這次上訴只是程序性，還是可能再次改變規
: 則，影響世界盃淘汰賽
: The Athletic had already reported that Belgium has requested the full rationale
: behind the decision to lift Balogun’s suspension, as well as the report from FI
: FA’s refereeing body. FIFA’s disciplinary committee can decide against sharing
: its rationale.
: 《The Athletic》先前報導，比利時要求FIFA提供解除禁賽的完整理由與裁判委員會報告，
: 但FIFA紀律委員會可以選擇不公開理由
: The RBFA also alleged that FIFA “deliberately removed the section concerning th
: e automatic suspension of players from its (pre-match) presentation” and said i
: t had “questioned FIFA, both orally and in writing, about the reasons for this
: change, yet once again received no response”.
: RBFA還指控FIFA「刻意從賽前簡報中移除了關於球員自動停賽的部分」，並表示已口頭與書
: 面詢問原因，但再次沒有得到回應
: Belgium’s statement concluded: “Regardless of the sporting outcome of this mat
: ch, the RBFA is deeply concerned by the course of events and will continue to fi
: ght in the coming hours, days and months in defence of the fundamental principle
: s of ethics, fair competition, and the interests of football as a whole.”
: 比利時聲明最後表示：「無論比賽結果如何，RBFA對此事件的發展深感憂慮，並將在接下來
: 的數小時、數天與數月持續為足球的倫理、公平競爭與整體利益而戰」

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 23.19.230.221 (美國)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WorldCup/M.1783358639.A.2BC.html
噓 Xration: 一堆國家整天嘴美國 現在搞事了你覺得美國怕被嘴喔
推 gyarados: 我看X說FIFA主席跳出來說窩哺知道 川普有打來沒錯但我
→ gyarados: 沒施壓 哈
噓 sctty: 你覺得美國會怕黑嗎 這世界不就拳頭力量大
→ Jaspercool: 尼泊爾是什麼野雞國家
→ Jaspercool: 這世界就是拳頭小的聽拳頭大的
噓 LimpBizKids: 沒實力不要大小聲。seafood講幾次了
噓 qlz: 川皇如果在乎敗美國國格就不是川皇了
→ twpost: 怎麼可能超過02年